Bill Ayers speaks out! An In These Times exclusive.

In These Times

PrintDiscuss
Views » June 19, 2008

The Great Election Robbery of 2008?

By Laura S. Washington

While the guardians of the establishment crow that American Democracy is a shining beacon for the world, our elections are corrupted.

Come Nov. 4, the elephant in the polling booth is the possibility that the 2008 presidential election will be stolen — again.

Loser Take All is a new collection of essays edited by Mark Crispin Miller. Subtitled “Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008,” the book reviews a contemporary slew of electoral mischief, hubris and thievery.

Miller has been around this block before. A professor of media, culture and communication at New York University, Miller authored the 2007 book, Fooled Again: The Real Case for Electoral Reform. He is a leading voice on media activism and electoral reform.

Miller wastes no time diving into the gloom and doom. By page three of his wide-ranging, sarcasm-laden introduction, he suggests that the United States is headed toward a fascist state. While “the guardians of the establishment” on both sides of the aisle crow that American Democracy is a shining beacon for the world, Miller writes, our so-called free and fair elections are seriously corrupted. He argues the American media has done its darndest to rewrite history and that the Bush/Cheney “re-election” of 2004 was a “masterpiece of fraud.”

And that’s just one of the myriad examples laid out in this detailed and compelling series of articles.

Miller marshals a brigade of contributors, including investigative reporters, editors, bloggers, university professors, activists, statisticians and tech nerds. They team up to present an array of warning signs that America should brace for the Great Election Robbery of 2008.

In the essay, “Diebold and Max Cleland’s Loss in Georgia,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — - a university professor, Air America talk show host and former assistant district attorney in New York City — - reveals the handiwork of the infamous Diebold e-voting machine and its role in the 2002 loss of Democratic U.S. Sen. Max Cleland to Republican challenger Saxby Chambliss.

Just months before the November 2002 election, the voting machine manufacturer managed to wrangle an exclusive $54 million contract to oversee and run the election machinery for all of Georgia. The Republican-friendly company “was authorized to put together ballots, program machines and train poll workers across the state — all without any official supervision,” Kennedy writes.

Diebold went on to illegally install software patches on 5,000 Diebold voting machines in two heavily Democratic Georgia counties. The patches, whistleblower Chris Hood explains, can be programmed to change the actual votes the machines record. “There could be a hidden program on a memory card that adjusts everything to the preferred election results,” Hood told Kennedy.

Six days before the election, Cleland was up in the polls by five percentage points. Election Day rolled around and — voila! — the popular Senate incumbent, war veteran and double amputee lost to opponent Chambliss by seven points.

Hood, a former consultant to Diebold and the son of African Americans who worked for voting rights in the South, argues that companies like Diebold have compromised the democratic process. “What I saw,” he says, “was basically a corporate takeover of our voting system.”

Despite citing a plethora of examples like this, Miller’s book can get bogged down in technical language. There’s a promising ring to the title of David L. Griscom’s piece, “How to Stuff the Electronic Ballot Box: ‘Hacking and Stacking’ in Pima County, Arizona.” But Griscom, a retired research physicist, quickly descends into a messy agglomeration of blurry statistics, indecipherable bar graphs and arcane acronyms.

Take this choice excerpt on page 124:

In the first row of Table 3, we see that [Sen. John] Kerry had a 5.0 percent smaller (negative) at-the-precinct vote share than his LD-27-wide average. We also see that Bush has a 4.5 percent larger at-the-precinct share than his LD-27-wide average. To get the “gross shift” of votes from Kerry to Bush, we subtract the number in the Kerry column on the same row as the Bush column.

Fa ged aboudit.

Still, once you skim through the tech stuff, there’s still plenty of critical evidence left that shows we have been lulled into a dangerous complacency about the integrity of our election system.

Loser Take All is a wakeup call at 3 a.m. from a screaming relative. Take heed.

Laura S. Washington, an In These Times senior editor, teaches journalism at DePaul University and is a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times.

More information about Laura S. Washington

  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    I think the Venusians are behind this scandalous conspiracy. They want to take over the earth, having already ruined their planet by allowing the republicans to cause global warming there. . . .

    Watch the skies and BEWARE!!!  :)

    Posted by wolf on Jun 19, 2008 at 8:38 AM

    Interesting story on pbs.org about big global cooling 75,000 years ago.

    Three scientists working independently — one taking artic ice cores, one taking deep ocean cores, and one studying volcanic ash — identified a massive volcanic erruption in Sumatra as the cause.

    Apparently all that is needed to offset (not the Al Gore thing) the global warming scare is to get a large volcano to belch.

    Unfortunately it probably requires sacrificing a virgin and there are so few left.

    (Perhaps they could throw in a phone or an airline.)

    Posted by whattheheck on Jun 19, 2008 at 9:27 AM

    its all good to see people writing about election fraud but what are democrats going to do about it?Talk is cheap and so is Mr.
    millers book only 10.95.can’t beat that price.Check out the book man its a little dry but I loved it and you will to.

    Posted by headed on Jun 19, 2008 at 12:52 PM

    Unfortunately it probably requires sacrificing a virgin and there are so few left.”

    You neglect the Dungeons and Dragons game rooms. Lots and lots of virgins, but mostly male—surely in this age of gender neutrality they would do?

    Posted by wolf on Jun 19, 2008 at 2:25 PM

    Well, Laura, sometimes if you want to understand something you just have suck it up and get a little bit technical. Maybe you could mention that to your journalism students at DePaul. Sheesh.

    Posted by SqueakyRat on Jun 19, 2008 at 9:51 PM

  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 10 posts.

Appeared in the july 2008 Issue
Also by Laura S. Washington
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS

Popularity

In These Times is published in Chicago. We’ve been around since 1976, fighting for workers’ rights, corporate accountability and progressive government. In other words, a better world. more

Copyright © 2008 In These Times