Read Senior Editor Susan J. Douglas's 8 reasons to make a tax-deductible donation to In These Times.
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
News > March 31, 2004

Cola Wars

Striking unionists battle Coke and paramilitaries

By Mischa Gaus

Protesting a mass firing of union leaders, 30 Coca-Cola workers in Colombia began a hunger strike March 15, which was met by death threats from paramilitaries known to have worked on the company’s behalf in the past.

A group of 91 workers—nearly three-fourths union leaders—was dismissed in February after Coca-Cola closed several plants. Protesters say the company targets union shops, and the hunger strikers in eight Colombian cities demand reinstatement of the fired workers.

A group affiliated with the country’s most notorious paramilitaries, the AUC, released a statement declaring war on the union leaders and promising to “finish them all off” if they do not leave the country in three months.

Paramilitaries acting with at least tacit approval of Colombian Coca-Cola officials are suspected in the murder of seven Coca-Cola unionists in recent years and the kidnapping and torture of others. About 3,600 Colombian union members have been killed in the last two decades, most at the hands of right-wing paramilitaries.

Daily updates from the hunger strikers detail threatening phone calls, police harassment, government indifference and company disciplinary hearings for strikers.

SINALTRAINAL, the Colombian Coca-Cola union, says 500 workers have been forced into retirement since September by consolidation, and when 91 workers refused the lump-sum buyout, they were fired. The workers’ collective bargaining agreement says they should be transferred, and even though a Colombian judge in January upheld that principle, the country’s labor ministry ruled against the workers.

“The ministry gives mixed results depending upon who is in power,” says Daniel Kovalik, counsel for the plaintiffs in a lawsuit against Coca-Cola filed in a Florida court on behalf of tortured and murdered union members. “Certainly, under the current [Colombian President Alvaro] Uribe administration, it is antagonistic toward the workers.”

Coca-Cola called the hunger strike “unfortunate,” saying it treated all employees fairly.

Anti-sweatshop student groups are pressuring their administrations to request an investigation of the violence against Coca-Cola workers. One school—DePaul University in Chicago—has asked the Worker Rights Consortium, which monitors compliance with the codes of conduct that corporations sign with colleges, to step in.

Acting at the behest of its affiliate schools, the WRC has investigated apparel factories worldwide. An agency official said examining Coca-Cola would be a natural extension of the group’s scope because some member schools have licensing contracts with the company.

“We see this as the same issue, just in a different industry,” says Jon Rodney, a University of California-Berkeley anti-sweatshop activist. “The university’s logo and image is tainted by this kind of exploitation and violence.”

Mischa Gaus is a freelance writer based in Chicago.

More information about Mischa Gaus
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    the coke boycott begins
    solidarity forever

    Posted by nelson on Mar 31, 2004 at 10:41 PM

    The Coke boycott began a long time ago

    Posted by Joel on Apr 2, 2004 at 4:09 PM

    i worked in Bogota three years .
    There is no social justice ,there is no justice period ,as long as ameican compaqnies act the way they act mainly for their stockholders there will be terrorism backlashes in this country .But we are just greedy and are not litening to the “voices “,and most americans don’t know what is done in their name in foreighn countries ,as long as the goods we import are cheap .............
    boycott is one small step....

    Posted by peter north on Apr 9, 2004 at 8:30 PM

    “Paramilitaries acting with at least tacit approval of Colombian Coca-Cola officials”

    How do you know this?

    In my experience, South American paramilitary groups don’t require approval, tacit or otherwise, from anyone to carry out their own manaical agendas.

    What if Columbian Coca Cola officials made a public statement “We are horrified and just wish the killing and harassment would stop” (Which I imaginr they have.)

    Do you think it would stop?

    Posted by Nus on Apr 16, 2004 at 12:52 PM

    Thank you for printing a story on this.  I have searched CNN, MSNBC, and the Chicago Sun-Times for information on this and surprise! not a negative word on Coca-Cola.  Thanks for keeping your priorities straight.

    Posted by Alexis Winter on Apr 20, 2004 at 10:48 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 7 posts.

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues

Also by Mischa Gaus
  • No Match? No Mas!
    The Department of Homeland Security is trying to force employers to either fire workers whose names and Social Security numbers don't match. Widespread job loss often results when the government dons its immigration-enforcement blinders
  • The Olympic Hustle
    Chicagoans are already beginning to fear what hosting the 2016 Summer Games might do to their city
  • Doing It For Themselves
    The Coalition of Immokalee Workers turns 'corporate social responsibility' from oxymoron into reality
  • Interrogations Behind Barbed Wire
    Who's to blame for America's new torture techniques?
  • Starbucks Gets Wobbly
    Embattled baristas at the coffee giant turn to the Industrial Workers of the World for solidarity unionism
  • Students vs. Sweatshops, Round III
    The Designated Supplier Program targets college clothing companies
"To people who say they are sick of the corporate dominated and celebrity fixated news media, I say, "Stop whining and subscribe to In These Times." --Barbara Ehrenreich
Popular Discussions