Donate today and get a free, signed copy of Rick Perlstein's new book Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America!
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Views > April 28, 2003

Bush Can Be Beaten

By Susan J. Douglas

How do we in the opposition counter this seemingly triumphant hegemony?
Tags   

Let’s face it: For now, Team Bush has won. What happens in Iraq over the next months and years is, of course, up for grabs, but whether most Americans will care remains to be seen.

Polls indicate that most don’t mind if any “weapons of mass destruction” are ever found, even though their elimination was allegedly one of the big reasons the United States invaded in the first place. The Team Bush propaganda machine worked nearly flawlessly: It convinced most Americans that Saddam Hussein was complicit in 9/11. The war as telecast in the United States was a highly sanitized affair culminating in grateful Iraqis kissing the Marines. Bush, whose popularity has once again soared, is seen going to church with recently released POWs and speaking only to cheering military crowds. The Democrats are depicted in the press as totally cowed, already beaten in 2004, utterly unable to counter the Bush juggernaut.

But no victory, as history reminds us, is ever complete. And while many on the left, and liberals as well, feel they have never lived in worse times politically, others—one thinks especially of the indefatigable Michael Moore—are rallying the troops and urging hope, optimism and resistance.

So how do we in the opposition counter this seemingly triumphant hegemony? First, we need to remind ourselves of the broad conception of America that Team Bush has been selling, both before and after 9/11. And then we need to expose this vision’s weaknesses because it is, in fact, too radical (or should we say counter-revolutionary?) for the great majority of Americans.

Ronald Reagan and the New Right took on the not-insignificant project of dismantling the welfare state, such as it was in the United States. The federal government, Reagan insisted, was too big and wasteful, larded with unnecessary and spirit-crushing bureaucracy, and its mission to protect citizens from the vagaries of capitalism was obsolete. It was pissing away your money on lazy people who didn’t deserve free handouts, while thwarting the very competitive spirit that made America great. At the same time, in the wake of Vietnam and the revolution in Iran, the Reagan Team sought to remasculinize foreign policy. In other words, Reagan offered a vision of renewed American greatness that could only be achieved by casting off the recent past and reverting to the cultural icon of the rugged (white male) individual. While it was obvious that Reaganism benefited the rich, the Reagan Team insisted it benefited everyone, especially the hardworking, tax-paying little guy.

This was a radical redefinition of the role of government in American life, and it took hold. But Team Bush seeks to take this vision of the nation to the ideological antipodes. And we in the opposition must counter their vision and offer competing images of the future of the country. The Democrats have done this only in fits and starts. Now is the time to begin.

Prior to 9/11, Team Bush, without much success, was trying to sell Reaganism with the fig leaf removed. Their vision for the future: the government should only serve the rich, the environment exists solely for corporate plunder, sexuality (especially female) must be closely regulated by the state, religious groups should take over the duties of government agencies, nearly everything the government does should be kept secret. After 9/11, of course, this agenda was eclipsed by one more Americans could embrace: The United States had to punish and eliminate the world’s terrorists.

Team Bush is now trying to use the self-image of a violated and noble America that is only interested in promoting democracy to sell another totally contradictory, and less appealing, self-conception: America will bully anyone it feels like abroad (and at home) and return to the project of converting the federal government into the sole tool of corporate America and the religious right, while abrogating as many civil rights as possible. The majority of Americans buy neither one of these visions. They are, after all, profoundly un-American.

Any successful opposition has to offer an equally broad, compelling counter-image of the future nation. And it must expose the one the Republicans are selling as fraudulent and dangerous. Many people are waiting to be enlisted in a different project, one that makes them feel noble about protecting the environment, about really, once and for all, transforming public education, about providing health care for everyone, and, yes, about putting forward a humane foreign policy.

In a classic case of history coming back to bite you in the ass, the transfer of responsibilities from the federal government to the states that the Republicans championed so incessantly has proven to be a disaster. Schools are closing early, poor kids are being denied medical treatment, libraries are shutting down, firefighters are getting laid off, police are selling ad space on their cop cars to make ends meet. The catastrophic condition of state budgets, now that Iraq is receding, is becoming major news. The “new federalism” is a failure. Every Democrat should say so.

Opposition leaders need to offer utter ridicule of Bush’s claim to be “compassionate.” And then they need to paint a picture of America as a community very different from the pugnacious, let-them-eat-cake vision Team Bush is hawking. What passes for our national “common sense” is not fixed, not even now; it is fashioned day in and day out. The successful opposition leader will need to fashion another common sense, one that combines self-interest with the desire to be noble, one that is already out there, waiting, rustling in the bushes.

Susan J. Douglas is a professor of communications at the University of Michigan and author of The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How it Has Undermined Women.

More information about Susan J. Douglas
Tags   
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    i couldn’t agree more. now who can we draft to our cause to speak this message eloquently and loudly?

    Posted by heather on Apr 28, 2003 at 4:29 PM

    This is a ridiculous story...somehow I ran across it looking up information on Iran. It was a sub-search on a previous search. I wish people like you would open your eyes. The media, has tarnished its image these last fews months...report the facts instead of you opinion. Just because you are in a position where you can influence people to the “right” way doesn’t mean you need to not report the truth. The truth disproves everything you say. 

    Posted by Kevin on Apr 28, 2003 at 10:50 PM

    Good piece. Inspirational. Unfortunately so many US citizens have been brainwashed by a compliant media, unfettered by the old Fairness Doctrine, and unleashed by deregualtion, that they actually believe the rightwing garbage pumped out day after day.

    Bush is in the final analysis, unAmerican.  Right now we have an unelected uneducated anti-democratic president in office, courtesy of the Supreme Court.

    We patriotic and thinking Americans need to take our country back from the radical right bornagains. We need to energize the Democratic party and at least elect a moderate in 2004. The Democratic party as it is constituted today is pathetic. 

    Posted by Russ Nichols on Apr 29, 2003 at 11:05 AM

    Since many of the writers in your excellent paper have shown that we are rapidly moving in the direction of a totalitarian state, I started reading this article with some hope.  Unfortunately, like most of the others I’ve read, this one does not even hint at how we are to counter this abomination of an administration. (A hint, perhaps?)

    Posted by Bob Schneider on Apr 29, 2003 at 5:43 PM

    The writer’s suggestion to expose our emperor’s lack of compassionate clothes is right on the money. Even more frightening than Bush himself is the number of people who buy his message--whatever that is. The Dems’ challenge is to figure out how to remove the gauze from the electorate’s eyes and show them how truly crooked it all is, then offer something truly compassionate, feasible and attainable.

    Posted by Alex on Apr 29, 2003 at 5:49 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 18 posts.

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues


Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of David Sirota's New York Times bestseller The Uprising: An Unauthorized Tour of the Populist Revolt Scaring Wall Street and Washington

Popular Discussions