Think small donations don't make a difference? Then Senior Editor Laura Washington has eight things to say to you.
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Views > December 19, 2003

Progressive Hope

By Joel Bleifuss

The role of money in politics feeds the disconnect between citizens and representative government.
Hope requires that one believe in a better future. In the realm of politics, hope is the necessary precursor to action. We hope for a more peaceful world, that our government will begin to put human needs before corporate profits, that one day “liberty and justice” will be for all.

A lack of hope can lead to nihilistic, anti-social, self-destructive behavior. Politically, the absence of hope is reflected in a loss of faith in representative democracy, a despair that social circumstances can’t be changed through collective action. Hopelessness becomes self-defeating: In the 2000 presidential election, 65 percent of eligible voters who were unemployed did not vote. Enough votes were left uncast to open the door for George W. Bush, who opposed an extension of benefits to the long-term unemployed.

The right’s attacks on “big government” and its tax-dollar wasting follies set up government institutions as the enemy of the people, thus fostering the alienation summed up in the phrase “You can’t fight city hall.”

What saps hope?

The role of money in politics, which rightly leads people to perceive elected officials as agents for the rich, feeds this disconnect between citizens and representative government. A study by Public Campaign found that in the 2000 and 2002 federal elections, a ZIP code on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, 10021, contributed the most money to federal candidates—$28.4 million. That one ZIP code, which is 86 percent white, paid out more money to federal candidates than the 532 ZIP codes with the largest percentage of African-American residents and the 533 ZIP codes with the largest percentage of Latino residents.

The gerrymandering of congressional districts to deny nonwhite people representation in Congress further dampens people’s faith in their own political agency. In Texas, for example, Republicans under the guidance of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay drew up a congressional map that changed the current 17-15 Democratic majority in the Texas congressional delegation to one with a 22-10 Republican majority. As Delay political aide Jim Ellis wrote in a memo released by Texas Democrats: “We must stress that a map that returns [Democratic U.S. Reps. Martin] Frost, [Chet] Edwards and [Lloyd] Doggett is unacceptable and not worth all the time invested in this project.”

The establishment media, which attempt to set the boundaries of acceptable thought and define what is politically important, exacerbate voter despair by turning politics into a sporting event. At a recent Democratic candidates debate, Dennis Kucinich scolded moderator Ted Koppel for failing to ask substantive questions of the candidates. Kucinich said:
Ted, I want the American people to see where the media takes politics in this country. We start talking about endorsements, now we’re talking about polls, and then we’re talking about money. Well, you know, when you do that, you don’t have to talk about what’s important to the American people.
And it is important for American people to have hope. One way is to work for a world we all deserve. In 2004 and in the years ahead, progressives should:
  • Ensure the defeat of President George W. Bush.
  • Mobilize behind the Democratic candidate by building political structures that survive, and thrive, beyond November 2004.
  • Back Public Campaign’s plan to institute campaign finance reform through a voluntary system of public financing, which has been passed in six states and continues to make progress at taking money out of politics.
  • Devise ways to scrap our winner-take-all electoral system and replace it with a more democratic system of proportional representation, as championed by the Center for Voting and Democracy.
  • Support and build independent media institutions that challenge the smug righteousness of the likes of Ted Koppel, that perform a civic duty by engaging citizens with each other and their community, and that, in the words of In These Times mission statement, oppose “the tyranny of marketplace values over human values.”
Joel Bleifuss is the editor of In These Times, where he has worked as an investigative reporter, columnist and editor since 1986. Bleifuss has had more stories on Project Censored's annual list of the “10 Most Censored Stories” than any other journalist.

More information about Joel Bleifuss

  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Dennis Kucinich is the One To Light The Way…
    And the corporate cartel knows this--That’s why they are working so hard to mute Dennis’ visibility…
    See for Yourself…
    http://kucinich.us/

    Posted by Mary V. Jones-Giampalo on Dec 19, 2003 at 6:23 PM

    Greetings,
    Fine piece as always, Joel. Yet..., and yet: Miami, Chiapas, warming seas, “rich get richer, the poor get the picture,” etc.
    Collective action, long the hope of the “progressive” ideal, is now easily handled and defused by authorities.  That’s why a good chunk of that $87 bil went to Miami - to prepare the cops for “crowd dispersal and intimidation tactics.”
    The lesson is simple, as eco-fighters have known for a while: Keep your head down while the madness plays out. All collective action will be ruthlessly suppressed.  Otherwise, as Noel Chomsky has said, “find a good lawyer.”
    We can also begin to see greater “terror” threats to justify a virtual “police state,” esp. as sales and distribution roll back after the Season of Consumption.  As Lewis Mumford once warned: “The great lesson of history is: Prepare for the unexpected.” Prepare for _lots_ of “unexpected in 04.”

    Posted by daigu on Dec 20, 2003 at 2:32 AM

    We all pray for a better future, but as long as there are people like the Bush and Chaney’s , will we?
    Will they re-act to revenge to a new Democrate President worse than they did to Clinton, if Bush lose’s?
    What next catastrophe will occur?

    Posted by Marta Kaye on Dec 20, 2003 at 4:50 AM

    This is an excellent article.  It reminds me to concentrate on hope and action instead of being bogged down in depression and defeat.  It is so difficult to deal with the current administration on a daily basis and realize that change IS possible.

    Posted by Ardis on Dec 21, 2003 at 2:56 PM

    I am still queasy about the second bullet item: Mobilize behind the Democratic candidate by building political structures that survive, and thrive, beyond November 2004.

    I recently faced a couple of Dean supporters who, believing that Dean has things pretty much locked up (or feeling real smug), and knowing that I was a Kucinich supporter, asked me whether I’d get behind whoever the Democratic nominee was.  I looked them square in the face and replied: You’d campaign for Lieberman?  Their jaws dropped and they muttered “er, a, well”, and pretty much agreed that they couldn’t stand Leiberman and that they could consider not voting for him.

    So, I suggest that until Dean supporters can agree that they’d get behind Lieberman- quit asking me to get behind Dean!

    Those paying attention to the race see that Kucinich’s views are starting to take hold.  Neither money, the internet, or the media can escape the truth.

    Looking back on the last 30 or so years of presidential elections I see that many people can claim that they picked a “winner”, but clearly this country has suffered losers.

    Recipie: think long term; add Kucinich, and stir!

    Posted by Mark Nagel on Dec 21, 2003 at 3:24 PM

  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 9 posts.

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues

Also by Joel Bleifuss

Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of Rick Perlstein's new book Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America!

Popular Discussions