Donate today and get a free, signed copy of David Sirota's New York Times bestseller The Uprising: An Unauthorized Tour of the Populist Revolt Scaring Wall Street and Washington
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
News > May 13, 2004

Good Call

Prison advocates fight to reduce phone fees

By Christopher Hayes

For inmates around the country, every opportunity to call friends and family is a mixed blessing. While phone calls provide a much-needed lifeline to the outside world, the exorbitant fees charged for collect calls by phone companies place a further burden on their loved ones.

But relief may soon be coming to relatives and friends of prisoners in North Carolina.

State officials earlier this month requested proposals for a new phone contract in which vendors would provide inmates with the option of setting up debit accounts to pay for calls.

“The debit features that we have specified were based on the fact that we wanted to offer inmates and their families other options for paying for calls,” says Patricia Deal, telecommunications manager for the state’s Division of Prisons.

Under the current contract, inmates’ friends and families can pay as much as 51 cents a minute, plus collect surcharges that can be as high as $2.25. For poor families and public defenders, the cumulative cost of collect call surcharges can quickly become a significant obstacle to staying in touch.

“For a decade it has been just a very serious problem for the families of inmates and for inmates themselves,” says Michael Hamden, executive director of North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services. “The inmates have difficulty maintaining ties because it’s ruinous to call repeatedly collect at these exorbitant rates, and the families are in the position of being extorted.”

Despite repeated complaints from prisoner advocacy groups nationwide, reform has been difficult. Many prisons, both private and public, negotiate exclusive contracts with phone carriers and then take a percentage of revenue as commission. This gives prison officials an incentive to squeeze as much money out of the calls as they can. Prisoner rights advocates argue that this system of financing effectively amounts to subsidizing prison costs out of the pockets of the families of the imprisoned.

For families of inmates serving in private prisons, sometimes thousands of miles from home, the costs are even more onerous, given phone calls represent the only means of routinely staying in touch. In March, a number of prisoner advocacy groups filed a petition supporting an earlier request that the FCC stop private prisons from signing exclusive contracts, require open competition among multiple carriers and allow inmates to set up debit accounts to avoid the markup for collect calls.

North Carolina’s prisons are public, and the state’s Department of Corrections receives a commission on all collect calls originating from prisons. This netted the DOC about $5 million last year. Deal says reductions in phone revenue could imperil prison services such as education opportunities, indigent inmate funds, and religious and leisure activities. But she’s hopeful that by giving prisoners the ability to pay through a debit account, more calls will be connected.

“It allows inmates to make calls [to people] that normally would not accept their calls because they can’t afford to,” she says, “so that could increase our revenue.”

Christopher Hayes is the Washington Editor of the Nation and a former senior editor of In These Times. Read more of his work at www.chrishayes.org.

More information about Christopher Hayes
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    My son is incarcerated in Siskiyou County, CA. I pay $4.90 for the first minute and .59 cents a minute up to 10 min. It is very important that I talk to my son about his affairs so decisions can be made. He is paying for his crime by being incarcerated. Why is it that as his mother I am also paying for his crime through outragous telephone bills?

    Posted by Millie Mondragon on Nov 8, 2004 at 8:29 AM
  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues

Also by Christopher Hayes
  • The New Road to Serfdom
    Over the course of 500 pages in The Shock Doctrine, Naomi Klein documents the moments of chaos and disruption that allow a small coterie of experts to swoop in and administer what's invariably called "bitter medicine," "painful reforms" or "shock therapy"
  • Who’s Afraid of Democracy?
    Believing that "people are rational as consumers and irrational as voters," many conservatives would favor free markets without democracy
  • What We Learn When We Learn Economics
    Is a little economics a dangerous thing?
  • The Abramoff Babies
    Like the "Watergate Babies" of 1974, the new Democratic Congress will have to pick between sustanative or procedural reforms.
  • The Good War on Terror
    How the Greatest Generation helped pave the road to Baghdad
  • Economic Populism Proves Popular
    To thwart legislation that put caps on payday lending rates, Republican lawmakers in Oregon had to pass it

Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of David Sirota's New York Times bestseller The Uprising: An Unauthorized Tour of the Populist Revolt Scaring Wall Street and Washington

Popular Discussions