Taiwanese Workers Battle AIG Over $437M Pension Fund
August 20
2:59 pm
A man walks past the Taiwan Nan Shan Life Insurance building, a subsidiary of the troubled global insurance giant American International Group (AIG), in Taipei. (Photo by AFP/Getty Images)
Insurance agents at Nan Shan Life of Taiwan scored a preliminary victory in their battle to retain control of their pension funds when the company changes ownership.
Disgraced insurance giant AIG is trying to auction off Nan Shan, Taiwan’s second largest life insurer.
Last week, Nan Shan’s union said it would not rule out a strike to safeguard its pension plan.
The union’s 36,000 members want to stop AIG from treating the $437 million pension fund as an asset of Nan Shan to be sold off to the highest bidder.
The union says that the fund is not AIG’s to sell. When a company pays into a worker’s pension fund, that money belongs to the person who earned it. The union is making its case to the public in front page newspaper ads.
Taiwan’s top financial regulator gave the union a preliminary victory this week when he ruled that the pension dispute must be settled before Nan Shan can change hands.
Nan Shan management announced on Thursday that it was willing to jointly manage the fund with the union, but the union wants the money back. Nan Shan says only AIG can make that call. AIG has reportedly hired consultants to look into the matter.
About a dozen firms have submitted bids to buy Nan Shan, but only about half that number are still in contention. The financial press is reporting that the uncertainty surrounding the pension fund is causing some bidders to reconsider how much the company is worth to them.
So, AIG might not get as much for Nan Shan as it initially hoped. The financial press is reporting this like it’s some kind of tragedy, but it’s really just the market at work. A company with binding obligations really is worth less than a company that’s free and clear. Pension obligations are serious business. If buyers hoped to raid Nan Shan’s pension fund, they may be sorely disappointed—but the company’s insurance agents won’t be.
Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein · + share/save
Please Login to Comment register a new account »
About this Blog
"Working In These Times" is dedicated to providing independent and incisive coverage of the labor movement and the struggles of workers to obtain safe, healthy and just workplaces. more
Recent Posts 
- Brand-New Nurses Union Aims to Ramp Up Organizing, Push for Single-Payer December 8
- Working Families’ Bailout Needed Urgently. But Who Will Make it Happen? December 8
- It’s Official: Three Unions Merge to Form Nurses ‘Super Union’ December 8
- A Penny for Our Work: Florida Farmworkers Protest Grocer December 8
- Senators Move To Shred Public Option, Fool Progressives While Unions Fight Back December 7
WORKING E-NEWSLETTER:
Receive our weekly blog round-up
Contributors
Blogroll
- Work in Progress (FDL)
- Labor Is Not a Commodity
- United Steelworkers Blog
- Jobs With Justice
- Association for Union Democracy
- National Labor Relations Board
- Open Left
- AFSCME Blog
- Talking Points Memo
- Democracy Now!
- Union Review
- Economic Policy Institute
- Robert Reich
- Left Turn
- Today’s Workplace
- Alternet: Workplace
- AFL-CIO Now Blog
- Change to Win Connect
- Monthly Review
- Talking Union
- Christopher Hayes’ Capitolism
- Labour Start
- Labor Notes
- Working Life
- Dollars and Sense
- American Prospect


Comments
There are not any comments yet.
Start the discussion below!